<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Annoying Street Preachers Annoy Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeygibson.com/2009/04/24/annoying-street-preachers-annoy-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeygibson.com/2009/04/24/annoying-street-preachers-annoy-me/</link>
	<description>Java, Clojure, Scala, Groovy, Ruby, Python, Lisp, Objective-C, OSX, politics, religion, Koine Greek, Tae Kwon Do, Spanish and much more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:22:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://joeygibson.com/2009/04/24/annoying-street-preachers-annoy-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeygibson.com/?p=1096#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t see them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t see them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://joeygibson.com/2009/04/24/annoying-street-preachers-annoy-me/comment-page-1/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeygibson.com/?p=1096#comment-898</guid>
		<description>Jesus: &quot;I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.&quot; (John 14:6)

I think this pretty much sums it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus: &#8220;I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.&#8221; (John 14:6)</p>
<p>I think this pretty much sums it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot</title>
		<link>http://joeygibson.com/2009/04/24/annoying-street-preachers-annoy-me/comment-page-1/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeygibson.com/?p=1096#comment-889</guid>
		<description>Quite apart from the fact that if you&#039;re insisting on a literal interpretation of the Old Testament you&#039;re quickly tied in knots because there&#039;s stuff in there that no modern person can possibly believe as literal truth.

Leviticus (the book that causes most of these problems) is a 6th-5th century B.C. manual for Jewish priestly ritual. It highlights the problem with all literal interpretations of any holy text: who is doing the interpretation and why they are interpreting it any particular way. Which shows that a &quot;literal&quot; interpretation is no more valid than any other interpretation: it simply is informed by your particular spiritual tradition, an interpretation from a tradition. And the hellfire-and-brimstone tradition that likes to claim ultimate truth on interpretation of the Christian Bible is simply another one of the available traditions. Of course, trying to argue this to a devout believer of that particular tradition is usually pointless almost from any viewpoint, Christian, other religious, or atheist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite apart from the fact that if you&#8217;re insisting on a literal interpretation of the Old Testament you&#8217;re quickly tied in knots because there&#8217;s stuff in there that no modern person can possibly believe as literal truth.</p>
<p>Leviticus (the book that causes most of these problems) is a 6th-5th century B.C. manual for Jewish priestly ritual. It highlights the problem with all literal interpretations of any holy text: who is doing the interpretation and why they are interpreting it any particular way. Which shows that a &#8220;literal&#8221; interpretation is no more valid than any other interpretation: it simply is informed by your particular spiritual tradition, an interpretation from a tradition. And the hellfire-and-brimstone tradition that likes to claim ultimate truth on interpretation of the Christian Bible is simply another one of the available traditions. Of course, trying to argue this to a devout believer of that particular tradition is usually pointless almost from any viewpoint, Christian, other religious, or atheist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Goff</title>
		<link>http://joeygibson.com/2009/04/24/annoying-street-preachers-annoy-me/comment-page-1/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Goff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeygibson.com/?p=1096#comment-887</guid>
		<description>Those kinds of preachers annoy the heck out of me, too.

I have a friend who is B&#039;ahai, and they basically believe what you do. I&#039;ve always found it logically inconsistent. Paths that travel in fundamentally different directions can&#039;t go to the same place.

However, I do believe that while there is only one path, everyone is given the opportunity to see it and decide whether or not they&#039;ll take it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those kinds of preachers annoy the heck out of me, too.</p>
<p>I have a friend who is B&#8217;ahai, and they basically believe what you do. I&#8217;ve always found it logically inconsistent. Paths that travel in fundamentally different directions can&#8217;t go to the same place.</p>
<p>However, I do believe that while there is only one path, everyone is given the opportunity to see it and decide whether or not they&#8217;ll take it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

