So A Guy Comes To My Door, Wanting To Sell Me Some Meat…

As the title suggests, about 30 minutes ago a guy comes to the door, wanting to sell me some meat. That sounds like the setup for a bad joke, but it isn’t. My wife told him to wait outside, and then she came and got me. I went out on the porch and he proceeded to tell me that he was from “The Cattle Exchange” and that he had some great deals on “steaks, pork, chicken and seafood.” I walked up to his truck, and he proceeded to show me a box of nice-looking, vacuum-packaged steaks. After showing me all the meat, he whipped out a price list. Here’s a recap of the ensuing discussion

Him: Now, if you were to order this online, it would cost you $451. But when I’m out here, doing what I do, I’m supposed to get $299…

Me: Wow. That’s still a lot of money.

Him: … and if you buy the case, I’ll throw in a case of chicken for $20.

Me: That’s still an awful lot of money for meat.

Him: Well, what if I cut another $100 off that price?

Me: You know, I’m gonna pass. We just don’t eat that much steak. Plus, that’s still a lot of money, to a company I’ve never heard of, and a guy who showed up at my door wanting to sell me some meat. No offense. (That last was said in my best Paulie Walnuts voice, with the appropriate hand gestures.) I’ll look your company up online and maybe think about it.

He then packed up his wares and left.

The whole thing just felt wrong. My first thought was that either this guy is ripping off his company, and selling it for less than he was supposed to, or his company was ripping people off on their website. I came back inside and looked up the company. It turns out my Spidey Sense™ was spot on with this outfit. Check out this headline Atlanta Cattle Exchange Complaints – Door-to-door meat sellers rip off! The comments are pretty enlightening, too. Looks like I made the right decision in not trusting him. It’s basically a scam from start to finish.

So, if a guy shows up at your door trying to sell you some meat, you should… wait for it… send him packing. Get it? Get it? Meat… packing… Thank you, thank you. I’ll be here all week. Try the veal and remember to tip your waitress.

iPhone Interface For My Blog

09/28/2009 Update: Now added a link to the view from Android.

Last week I learned about WPTouch, which is a plugin for WordPress that reformats the theme for the iPhone, Android and other mobile devices. It was an easy install, and I am now happy to report that if you view my blog on a mobile device, you’ll see the new UI. Here’s what it looks like on an iPhone


If anybody has an Android phone, or some other supported mobile device, send me a screenshot so I can see what it looks like.

Thanks to Steve Ziegler, here’s what it looks like from an Android device. Thanks, Steve!

I’m Liking Scala’s XML Literals

How many times have you written a class that you needed to save and restore to/from XML? How did you do it? There are libraries that will do this for you, but I don’t know if any of them have taken the lead. Usually, you have to either have external XML templates that will be filled in, or you have to create the XML through code using DOM or JDOM or some other DOM. I think Scala has a better way.

Enter Scala’s XML literals. In Scala, you can embed XML right in the middle of regular Scala code. For example,

val num = 23

val xml = 

In this code, we assign to the val called num the Int value of 23. We then assign the xml val an XML Node, that begins with “person”. That’s neat, but not terribly useful. Here’s where it gets really interesting.

import scala.xml.{Node, XML}

class Person(val id: Int,
			 val firstName: String,
			 val lastName: String,
			 val title: String) {

	override def toString = {
		id + ", " + firstName + " " + lastName + ": " + title
	def toXML = {

object Person {
	def fromXML(node: Node): Person = {
		new Person(
			(node  "id").text.toInt,
			(node  "firstName").text,
			(node  "lastName").text,
			(node  "title").text

val p = new Person(23, "Tom", "Servo", "Robot")

val xml = p.toXML


XML.saveFull("Person.xml", xml, "UTF-8", true, null)

val xmlFromFile = XML.loadFile("Person.xml")

val p1 = Person.fromXML(xmlFromFile)

That’s a longer example, but there’s a lot of interesting stuff in there. Lines 3 – 20 are defining a Scala class, but look at lines 12 – 19. Those lines define a method called toXML that returns the current instance of the class, serialized to XML. I’ve defined the XML structure that I want, and Scala will fill in the values by replacing the stuff between the curly braces with whatever those expressions evaluate to. In this case, it’s just the instance variables, but it could be anything you want, including more XML. So if you have a more complex data structure, it could call the toXML method on its instance variables, and they could handle their own serialization, which would then be placed where it should be in the parent XML document. Nifty, eh?

Now, look at lines 22 – 31. This bit of code is defining a companion object to the Person class, which defines a method to deserialize XML into an instance of class Person. Strictly speaking, I didn’t have to use a companion object; I could have just defined the fromXML method at the top level, but I think this makes the code cleaner. What this method does is take an XML node, tear it apart, and return an instance of class Person, with its instance variables populated.

Lines 33 – 45 exercise this code. The result of running this example look like this

box:~/tmp> scala person.scala 
23, Tom Servo: Robot
23, Tom Servo: Robot

Pretty neat, eh? In the exercise code, we created a Person object, printed it out, serialized it to XML, printed that out, then saved the XML to a file. We then read that file back in, and deserialized it into another instance of class Person. Using XML literals for de/serialization is a nice application. I can see using this quite a lot. I like how it keeps the XML format right there with the code it will represent, so that when you change the code, you’ll remember to change the XML, too.

Bogus Search Results From Sys-Con

Updated! Be sure to scroll down for the latest!

I’m writing a blog post dealing with Scala’s XML literal syntax and how to use it for object de/serialization and so I wanted to get a list of existing Java XML de/serialization libraries. I went to Google and searched for “java xml serialization” and here’s the first result that I got


Notice the date, which is April 23, 2009. That is, ostensibly, the publication date of the article, right? Now check what happens when you click the link and go to read the article


Again, notice the date. It’s six years ago! So, where did Google get the 2009 date? That’s the date of the latest comment on the article. I’m not sure how they are getting Google to display the latest comment date in such a way that it looks like the publication date, but it looks like they are. I can’t imagine that Google just picked that date from the article when it spidered the site. Am I reading too much into this, or is Sys-Con gaming Google for better placement?

09/24/2009 4:26PM Update: Just for grins, I did my Google search for “java xml serialization” again. The Sys-Con article is still the top hit, but notice what’s missing from the search result


Notice, that there is no longer a date showing. Very interesting.

Scala’s Nice Regex Class

I’m a big fan of regular expressions, because they let you parse text in very concise, and sometimes complicated, ways. Though I agree with jwz about regular expressions in lots of cases, I still use them frequently. Perl was the first language that really let me use regex, way back in 1991. After that I used various implementations in C, Python, Ruby, Java and various other languages. While I was glad that Java 5 finally added regex support, I was disappointed at the implementation. It’s kind of clunky, and because Java doesn’t have regex syntax baked into the language, and no support for “raw” strings, you end up with a regex with twice as many backslashes as necessary.

Last night while reading Programming In Scala, I came upon the discussion of Scala’s regex class. Scala has a raw string, so you have exactly as many backslashes in your pattern as necessary, but each regex you create also defines a Scala extractor, so you can easily bind local variables to groups within the expression.

First, let’s look at the Java code.

[java]Pattern emailParser = Pattern.compile("([\w\d\-\_]+)(\+\d+)?@([\w\d\-\.]+)");

String s = "";

Matcher m = emailParser.matcher(s);

if (m.matches())
String name =;
String num =;
String domain =;

System.out.printf("Name: [%s], Num: [%s], Domain: [%s]n", name, num, domain);

That’s pretty simple, though the double-backslashes really annoy me. Running this code results in the local variables name and domain getting assigned parts of the email address. The variable called num is assigned null, because the email address didn’t contain a plus sign followed by a number. Now, here’s the same program in Scala.

[scala highlight=”1, 5″]val EmailParser = """([wd-_]+)(+d+)?@([wd-.]+)""".r

val s = ""

val EmailParser(name, num, domain) = s

printf("Name: %s, Domain: %sn", name, domain)[/scala]

In line 1, we are calling the “r” method on a raw string. This method converts the String into a Regex and returns it. We’re then assigning it to a local val called EmailParser. Also notice line 5. In that one line, we are declaring three local vals and assigning them whatever the groups in the regex matched, or null if they didn’t match. Just like with the Java example, num will be null since there was no plus sign followed by a number. If you change the email address in either example to something like “”, then all three variables will be assigned parts of the string.

Do you have to have this level of support to do regex? No. Does it make things a lot nicer? Indeed.

Now, I just discovered that in Scala if the regex doesn’t match at all, then a MatchError is thrown. That’s sort of a bummer, because it means you’ll have to add a try/catch around your code. Still, I like the extractor syntax that binds regex groups to local variables in one step.

You can see some more examples of regex in Scala over here.

Announcing JUnitLaunchFixer Eclipse Plugin

My friend Chris and I both work for the same company. Our product has around 900 JUnit tests, and for some of them, the default heap size that Eclipse runs JUnit tests with has become too small. You can change the heap size on individual JUnit launchers, but if you have lots of tests, this gets tedious. It also means that you have to run a test, see if it runs out of heap, change the setting and then rerun the test. We both thought there had to be a better way.

We were wrong. There is apparently no way within Eclipse to set a default heap size for JUnit launchers, which means you have to set them individually. We don’t like that.

Thus, JUnitLaunchFixer was born. This is an Eclipse plugin that will set the max heap size on a JUnit launcher when it is created to a value you have previously specified in the plugin preferences. The default is 1G, but you can tailor it to whatever you want. The first time you start Eclipse after installing the plugin, you will be presented with a selectable list of launchers that you can update, and a chance to set the default heap size. You can select as many or as few as you want. This will only be run once, unless you ask for it to run again by setting a preference.

JUnitLaunchFixer is released under the Eclipse Public License. It’s an open source project, so if there’s something you’d like to see it do, or you want to help out, let us know.

As of this moment, it’s only been tested with Eclipse Ganymede (3.4) on Windows 7 and Snow Leopard. I will be testing with Europa and Galileo soon.

You can download the source and build it yourself, but we also have an Eclipse update site to easily install it from